- Leveling Up
- Posts
- the $25,000 auto-reply
the $25,000 auto-reply
Give an agent a firm price and let it hold the line
Every week, people email wanting to sponsor my YouTube channel and podcast. But I never see those threads anymore.
An agent handles the whole conversation. When a request comes in, it replies on my behalf: “Mr. Siu's queue is tight, he is only reviewing fixed-fee sponsorships at $25,000 for one post. If that works, send the product, campaign timing, usage rights, required talking points, and disclosure requirements.”
When someone counters with a $100 budget, it restates the number and moves on. No back and forth. No hour of my week gone. And the third-person framing elevates our positioning on its own: Mr. Siu's team is handling the negotiation.
The part that made me laugh came when I checked the log: "tuning applied." Unprompted, it had added search terms for rate cards and audience insights, tightened the offer copy around one simple post, and added a dedicated video bundle. It got better at the job without me touching it.
If you want a marketing team that operates this way without building it from scratch, that's exactly what we run at Single Brain. Agent-native, not Stone Age. https://www.singlebrain.com/ |
The same setup now runs daily across my pipeline. It flags stale deals, pulls up the ones we lost, and drafts the follow-up messages. I read, approve, send.
To copy this:
Pick a conversation you dread. Maybe that’s sponsorships, discount requests, or scope creep.
Give your agent a firm number and a list of what to collect before the ask ever reaches you.
Have it log its own changes so you can watch it improve.
And yes, people pay the $25,000. But even when they walk away, the number did its job. It filtered a conversation I never wanted to have.
Watch the a breakdown here: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/JJLN3CQIDgQ
To never negotiating twice,
Eric Siu